MMD / MCA ORALS >> Master Exam oral questions and answers
ORAL
QUESTIONS
ADD YOUR
QUESTIONS
Examination Center
Surveyor
ARRANGE
 

MASTER EXAM ORAL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS BY CAPT-SUNDARAM - LATEST QUESTIONS



DOWNLOAD

Asked 1 time (Latest on 29-Aug-2014)

Q. 1) Various codes in PSC deficiency list - explanations as with master's point of view

X
    Answer this MMD / MCA Oral Question



    Asked 1 time (Latest on 29-Aug-2014)

    Q. 2) Various berthing possibilities (strong current , no tugs and no pilot)

    X
      Answer this MMD / MCA Oral Question

      Asked 1 time (Latest on 29-Aug-2014)

      Q. 3) Explain ga ? does the incident of pratibha cauvery classify as ga ? justify your answer ? ?

      X
        Answer this MMD / MCA Oral Question

        Asked 1 time (Latest on 29-Aug-2014)

        Q. 4) Which certificate gives you the max. no. of crew on board ?

        X
          Answer this MMD / MCA Oral Question

          Asked 1 time (Latest on 29-Aug-2014)

          Q. 5) Which statutory certificate does not have annual endorsements ? ?

          X
            Answer this MMD / MCA Oral Question

            Asked 1 time (Latest on 29-Aug-2014)

            Q. 6) Recent dg circulars and ms notices

            X
              Answer this MMD / MCA Oral Question

              Asked 1 time (Latest on 09-May-2014)

              Q. 7) Can the mmd chief examiner cancel / suspend your coc ?

              X
                Karthi Keyan
                146
                X
                0

                Merchant Shipping (Cancellation or Suspension of Certificate of Competency) Rules, 2003

                Grounds for cancellation or Suspension of Certificates of Competency by Chief Examiner of Master & Mates or Chief Examiner of Engineers--
                Any Certificate of Competency, which has been granted by the Central Government or an officer duly authorized by it in this behalf, to any person may be cancelled or suspended for any specified length of period by the Chief Examiner of Master and Mates or the Chief Examiner of Engineers, on the following circumstances :--

                Incompetency, omission or commission of such acts by the holder of the Certificate, which may lead to personal injury, death or shipping casualty.
                If it is found that the said person is guilty of any gross act of misconduct, drunkenness or tyranny, or in a case of collision, has failed to render assistance, or to give such information, or that the loss, stranding or abandonment of, or damage to any ship, or loss of life has been caused by his wrongful act or default.
                Enquiry into misconduct/incompetency-
                The cancellation or suspension of Certificate of Competency shall be made only after enquiry by the Chief Examiner or an authorized Officer on his behalf.
                Issue of show cause notice---
                No order shall be passed for cancellation or suspension of certificates unless the person concerned has been given a reasonable opportunity of giving representation against the proposed order through appropriate show cause notice.
                Provision for appeal against order of cancellation/suspension---
                A person whose certificate has been cancelled or suspended may appeal against such order to the Director General of Shipping within 30 days from the date of receipt of such order canceling or suspending his Certificate of Competency. The decision of the Director General of Shipping shall be final.

                Karthi Keyan | | EDIT | REPLY

                  Asked 1 time (Latest on 03-Oct-2013)

                  Q. 8) Above you decide to abandon the l / b.action ?

                  X
                    Answer this MMD / MCA Oral Question

                    Asked 2 time (Latest on 03-Oct-2013)

                    Q. 9) What are the various charter party clauses ? exp both to blame collosion clause , sue & labour clause

                    X
                      Khayyum Mak
                      1
                      X
                      0

                      Ships A and B collide in American waters. Ship A is the cargo-carrying ship, ship B the non-carrying
                      ship. Ship A is held by a US court to be 60% to blame for the collision, and ship B 40% to blame. Shipper A loses
                      $1000 worth of cargo damaged on ship A, but cannot claim against the owners, who are protected by their bill of
                      lading terms (incorporating the Hague-Visby Rules). Shipper S is allowed to claim the entire $1000 from the owners
                      of the non-carrying ship B. But Ship B is only 40% to blame, so her owners can claim $600 back from the owners of ship A. The net effect is that the owners of ship A, while in no way contractually liable to shipper S, must pay 60%
                      of S’s loss.

                      Khayyum Mak | | EDIT | REPLY

                        DOWNLOAD